Best Known (29, 60, s)-Nets in Base 32
(29, 60, 196)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 60, 196)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 22, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 38, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (7, 22, 98)-net over F32, using
(29, 60, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(29, 60, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on (29, 70, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 50, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 50, 288)-net over F128, using
(29, 60, 413)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (29, 60, 413)-net over F32, using
(29, 60, 172441)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 60, 172442)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 59, 172442)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 63658 188659 329244 081435 664304 656884 038396 163154 240335 251830 008976 986610 422550 410928 229288 > 3259 [i]