Best Known (34, 69, s)-Nets in Base 32
(34, 69, 202)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 69, 202)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (34, 70, 202)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 25, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (9, 45, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 25, 98)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(34, 69, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(34, 69, 288)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (33, 69, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 84, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 60, 288)-net over F128, using
- 15 times m-reduction [i] based on (33, 84, 288)-net in base 32, using
(34, 69, 522)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (34, 69, 522)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3269, 522, F32, 35) (dual of [522, 453, 36]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(3269, 1023, F32, 35) (dual of [1023, 954, 36]-code), using
(34, 69, 242754)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 69, 242755)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 68, 242755)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 239749 165192 492152 190404 542442 997219 771476 374054 167772 889157 493510 049583 728143 738864 892004 626632 802248 > 3268 [i]