Best Known (44, 79, s)-Nets in Base 32
(44, 79, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 79, 240)-net over F32, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (44, 88, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 33, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 55, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 33, 120)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(44, 79, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(44, 79, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 17 times m-reduction [i] based on (44, 96, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 80, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 80, 513)-net over F64, using
(44, 79, 1391)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (44, 79, 1391)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(3279, 1391, F32, 35) (dual of [1391, 1312, 36]-code), using
- 352 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (6, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 62 times 0, 1, 94 times 0, 1, 123 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3266, 1026, F32, 35) (dual of [1026, 960, 36]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(34) ⊂ Ce(33) [i] based on
- linear OA(3266, 1024, F32, 35) (dual of [1024, 958, 36]-code), using an extension Ce(34) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,34], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 35 [i]
- linear OA(3264, 1024, F32, 34) (dual of [1024, 960, 35]-code), using an extension Ce(33) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,33], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(320, s, F32, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(34) ⊂ Ce(33) [i] based on
- 352 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (6, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 9 times 0, 1, 18 times 0, 1, 34 times 0, 1, 62 times 0, 1, 94 times 0, 1, 123 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3266, 1026, F32, 35) (dual of [1026, 960, 36]-code), using
(44, 79, 1864505)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 79, 1864506)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 78, 1864506)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2521 729383 970096 522042 453825 012318 506071 122969 348803 050444 518111 203397 729900 013203 355284 915084 377283 106620 487116 543135 > 3278 [i]