Best Known (41, 86, s)-Nets in Base 32
(41, 86, 218)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (41, 86, 218)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (41, 87, 218)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (7, 30, 98)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 98, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 97)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 57, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (7, 30, 98)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(41, 86, 288)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(41, 86, 288)-net in base 32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (40, 86, 288)-net in base 32, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on (40, 108, 288)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on (22, 90, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 288, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 287)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 78, 288)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (22, 91, 288)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on (22, 90, 288)-net in base 64, using
- 22 times m-reduction [i] based on (40, 108, 288)-net in base 32, using
(41, 86, 513)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (41, 86, 513)-net over F32, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(3286, 513, F32, 2, 45) (dual of [(513, 2), 940, 46]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(3286, 1026, F32, 45) (dual of [1026, 940, 46]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(44) ⊂ Ce(43) [i] based on
- linear OA(3286, 1024, F32, 45) (dual of [1024, 938, 46]-code), using an extension Ce(44) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,44], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
- linear OA(3284, 1024, F32, 44) (dual of [1024, 940, 45]-code), using an extension Ce(43) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 322−1, defining interval I = [1,43], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 44 [i]
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(320, s, F32, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(44) ⊂ Ce(43) [i] based on
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(3286, 1026, F32, 45) (dual of [1026, 940, 46]-code), using
(41, 86, 190905)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (41, 86, 190906)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (41, 85, 190906)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 86 652757 752729 669228 070118 289712 963078 151335 647706 311535 497564 786764 562367 250959 813791 257906 253846 294276 673919 123784 622273 033972 > 3285 [i]