Best Known (20, 89, s)-Nets in Base 32
(20, 89, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (20, 89, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 89, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(20, 89, 128)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(20, 89, 128)-net in base 32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (20, 90, 128)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 75, 128)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 127)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 75, 128)-net over F64, using
(20, 89, 177)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (20, 89, 177)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (20, 176)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 20 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
(20, 89, 3416)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (20, 89, 3417)-net in base 32, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (20, 88, 3417)-net in base 32, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 856440 627109 294571 783946 226186 624270 265677 403423 612389 024171 203998 096007 911594 326864 507161 389845 537932 174260 294074 937952 983435 141000 > 3288 [i]