Best Known (45, 91, s)-Nets in Base 32
(45, 91, 240)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (45, 91, 240)-net over F32, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (11, 34, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- digital (11, 57, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32 (see above)
- digital (11, 34, 120)-net over F32, using
(45, 91, 513)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(45, 91, 513)-net in base 32, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on (45, 102, 513)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 85, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (28, 85, 513)-net over F64, using
(45, 91, 648)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (45, 91, 648)-net over F32, using
(45, 91, 274305)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (45, 91, 274306)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 93038 813059 337231 227348 205026 766965 730578 374061 304600 556032 240852 632886 747133 197840 273157 870097 929963 601642 891492 077059 686329 967336 676544 > 3291 [i]