Best Known (23, 93, s)-Nets in Base 32
(23, 93, 120)-Net over F32 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 93, 120)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (11, 93, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
(23, 93, 177)-Net in Base 32 — Constructive
(23, 93, 177)-net in base 32, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (23, 96, 177)-net in base 32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (7, 80, 177)-net over F64, using
(23, 93, 185)-Net over F32 — Digital
Digital (23, 93, 185)-net over F32, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 93, 185)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 185, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 184)-sequence over F32, using
(23, 93, 4462)-Net in Base 32 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 93, 4463)-net in base 32, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 95 925440 340603 189106 653622 946718 663120 168239 328158 024459 642200 900604 466681 770611 878841 994579 284955 517176 895476 470812 654841 174457 258101 725340 > 3293 [i]