Best Known (40, 40+100, s)-Nets in Base 4
(40, 40+100, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (40, 140, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 140, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(40, 40+100, 75)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (40, 140, 75)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (40, 74)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 40 and N(F) ≥ 75, using
(40, 40+100, 264)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (40, 140, 265)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4140, 265, F4, 100) (dual of [265, 125, 101]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(440, 164, S4, 25), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 14 570521 423098 291305 264511 747942 665498 471933 411328 / 11 371893 759058 304198 150255 > 440 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(440, 164, S4, 25), but
(40, 40+100, 275)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (40, 140, 276)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2 018425 655940 634910 743009 178845 194294 675780 923006 294510 777730 468181 266535 303220 671000 > 4140 [i]