Best Known (257−101, 257, s)-Nets in Base 4
(257−101, 257, 160)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (156, 257, 160)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (33, 83, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 174, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (33, 83, 56)-net over F4, using
(257−101, 257, 387)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (156, 257, 387)-net over F4, using
(257−101, 257, 7812)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (156, 257, 7813)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (156, 256, 7813)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 13420 411930 945160 730070 600236 013174 105465 604966 085011 939341 220804 471691 297252 622197 777021 147926 475499 836019 115123 029096 371351 320425 290645 743448 330432 107248 > 4256 [i]