Best Known (144, 144+103, s)-Nets in Base 4
(144, 144+103, 137)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 247, 137)-net over F4, using
- 9 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 256, 137)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 185, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(144, 144+103, 308)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (144, 247, 308)-net over F4, using
(144, 144+103, 5264)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 247, 5265)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 246, 5265)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 12862 157560 533321 187784 648314 974550 812426 303539 681534 801949 100497 785233 785433 984125 294522 350616 016245 336125 561270 202161 799912 017555 888065 401264 305536 > 4246 [i]