Best Known (14, 14+131, s)-Nets in Base 4
(14, 14+131, 30)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (14, 145, 30)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (13, 145, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
(14, 14+131, 33)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (14, 145, 33)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (13, 145, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 32)-sequence over F4, using
(14, 14+131, 55)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (14, 145, 56)-net in base 4, because
- 37 times m-reduction [i] would yield (14, 108, 56)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4108, 56, S4, 2, 94), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 13 479973 333575 319897 333507 543509 815336 818572 211270 286240 551805 124608 / 95 > 4108 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4108, 56, S4, 2, 94), but