Best Known (183−16, 183, s)-Nets in Base 4
(183−16, 183, 3145725)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (167, 183, 3145725)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (45, 61, 1048575)-net over F64, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6461, 1048575, F64, 16, 16) (dual of [(1048575, 16), 16777139, 17]-NRT-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(6461, 8388600, F64, 16) (dual of [8388600, 8388539, 17]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6461, large, F64, 16) (dual of [large, large−61, 17]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777215 = 644−1, defining interval I = [0,15], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 17 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6461, large, F64, 16) (dual of [large, large−61, 17]-code), using
- OA 8-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(6461, 8388600, F64, 16) (dual of [8388600, 8388539, 17]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(6461, 1048575, F64, 16, 16) (dual of [(1048575, 16), 16777139, 17]-NRT-code), using
(183−16, 183, large)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (167, 183, large)-net over F4, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (167, 186, large)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(4186, large, F4, 19) (dual of [large, large−186, 20]-code), using
- 17 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4169, large, F4, 19) (dual of [large, large−169, 20]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16777217 | 424−1, defining interval I = [0,9], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−9,−8,…,9}|+1 = 20 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 17 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4169, large, F4, 19) (dual of [large, large−169, 20]-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–VarÅ¡amov bound [i] based on linear OA(4186, large, F4, 19) (dual of [large, large−186, 20]-code), using
(183−16, 183, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (167, 183, large)-net in base 4, because
- 14 times m-reduction [i] would yield (167, 169, large)-net in base 4, but