Best Known (206−183, 206, s)-Nets in Base 4
(206−183, 206, 34)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 206, 34)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 206, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
(206−183, 206, 45)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (23, 206, 45)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 44)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
(206−183, 206, 85)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 206, 86)-net in base 4, because
- 39 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 167, 86)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4167, 86, S4, 2, 144), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 5 389385 785865 341381 653845 487617 819044 230209 477720 875443 353098 774194 124190 027262 274822 736468 184804 622336 / 145 > 4167 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(4167, 86, S4, 2, 144), but