Best Known (61, 61+184, s)-Nets in Base 4
(61, 61+184, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (61, 245, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 245, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(61, 61+184, 99)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (61, 245, 99)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (61, 98)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 61 and N(F) ≥ 99, using
(61, 61+184, 254)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (61, 245, 255)-net over F4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4245, 255, F4, 184) (dual of [255, 10, 185]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(461, 70, F4, 46) (dual of [70, 9, 47]-code), but
- “Gur†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(461, 70, F4, 46) (dual of [70, 9, 47]-code), but
(61, 61+184, 396)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (61, 245, 397)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 3406 748771 314187 413647 895205 632523 335585 361553 363109 759964 027637 077018 575145 562842 762876 109394 616898 825672 206024 023266 133100 645712 000671 085508 281640 > 4245 [i]