Best Known (225−188, 225, s)-Nets in Base 4
(225−188, 225, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 225, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 225, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(225−188, 225, 66)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (37, 225, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (37, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 37 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
(225−188, 225, 156)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (37, 225, 157)-net over F4, because
- 76 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (37, 149, 157)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4149, 157, F4, 112) (dual of [157, 8, 113]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- linear OA(4148, 153, F4, 112) (dual of [153, 5, 113]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(436, 40, F4, 28) (dual of [40, 4, 29]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(48, 11, F4, 7) (dual of [11, 3, 8]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(436, 40, F4, 28) (dual of [40, 4, 29]-code), but
- OA(48, 157, S4, 4), but
- discarding factors would yield OA(48, 121, S4, 4), but
- the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that M ≥ 65704 > 48 [i]
- discarding factors would yield OA(48, 121, S4, 4), but
- linear OA(4148, 153, F4, 112) (dual of [153, 5, 113]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4149, 157, F4, 112) (dual of [157, 8, 113]-code), but
(225−188, 225, 161)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 225, 162)-net in base 4, because
- 67 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 158, 162)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4158, 162, S4, 121), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 8 543948 143683 640329 580086 824678 208458 410818 089426 611079 788166 431288 878903 122562 200091 848347 746304 / 61 > 4158 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4158, 162, S4, 121), but