Best Known (54, 54+192, s)-Nets in Base 4
(54, 54+192, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (54, 246, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 246, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(54, 54+192, 91)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (54, 246, 91)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 246, 91)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 91, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
(54, 54+192, 224)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (54, 246, 225)-net over F4, because
- 28 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (54, 218, 225)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4218, 225, F4, 164) (dual of [225, 7, 165]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(454, 60, F4, 41) (dual of [60, 6, 42]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(453, 59, F4, 40) (dual of [59, 6, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- “Liz†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(453, 59, F4, 40) (dual of [59, 6, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(454, 60, F4, 41) (dual of [60, 6, 42]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4218, 225, F4, 164) (dual of [225, 7, 165]-code), but
(54, 54+192, 230)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (54, 246, 231)-net in base 4, because
- 19 times m-reduction [i] would yield (54, 227, 231)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4227, 231, S4, 173), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 1 488565 707357 402911 845015 158554 633286 356257 506687 627387 456491 927921 949262 056238 946972 039271 861787 782268 441644 249633 132407 878864 135402 815488 / 29 > 4227 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4227, 231, S4, 173), but