Best Known (227−193, 227, s)-Nets in Base 4
(227−193, 227, 56)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 227, 56)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 227, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
(227−193, 227, 65)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (34, 227, 65)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 227, 65)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 64)-sequence over F4, using
(227−193, 227, 140)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 227, 141)-net in base 4, because
- 100 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 127, 141)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4127, 141, S4, 93), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 146 430564 889104 392909 100261 013841 119930 853683 468983 778269 356582 857126 296146 058611 261440 / 5003 564797 > 4127 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4127, 141, S4, 93), but