Best Known (55, 55+205, s)-Nets in Base 4
(55, 55+205, 66)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (55, 260, 66)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (49, 260, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
(55, 55+205, 91)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (55, 260, 91)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 260, 91)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 91, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 90)-sequence over F4, using
(55, 55+205, 229)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (55, 260, 230)-net over F4, because
- 37 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (55, 223, 230)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4223, 230, F4, 168) (dual of [230, 7, 169]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(455, 61, F4, 42) (dual of [61, 6, 43]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(453, 59, F4, 40) (dual of [59, 6, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- “Liz†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(413, 18, F4, 10) (dual of [18, 5, 11]-code), but
- 2 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(453, 59, F4, 40) (dual of [59, 6, 41]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(455, 61, F4, 42) (dual of [61, 6, 43]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4223, 230, F4, 168) (dual of [230, 7, 169]-code), but
(55, 55+205, 234)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (55, 260, 235)-net in base 4, because
- 29 times m-reduction [i] would yield (55, 231, 235)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4231, 235, S4, 176), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 762 145642 166990 290864 647761 179972 242614 403843 424065 222377 723867 096038 022172 794340 849684 107193 235344 521442 121855 812163 792833 978437 326241 529856 / 59 > 4231 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4231, 235, S4, 176), but