Best Known (34−25, 34, s)-Nets in Base 4
(34−25, 34, 22)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 34, 22)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 21)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 22, using
(34−25, 34, 26)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (9, 34, 26)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 25)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 26, using
(34−25, 34, 63)-Net over F4 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (9, 34, 64)-net over F4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (9, 33, 64)-net over F4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(433, 64, F4, 24) (dual of [64, 31, 25]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield OA(49, 39, S4, 6), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 504 832000 / 1843 > 49 [i]
- residual code [i] would yield OA(49, 39, S4, 6), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(433, 64, F4, 24) (dual of [64, 31, 25]-code), but
(34−25, 34, 65)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 34, 66)-net in base 4, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(434, 66, S4, 25), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 604 960001 283991 112309 250407 192187 024483 029217 018440 762263 061173 021045 360659 791872 / 1 890179 221099 436971 006558 191042 915661 275690 944803 178900 711059 > 434 [i]