Best Known (166−28, 166, s)-Nets in Base 4
(166−28, 166, 1542)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 166, 1542)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (40, 54, 514)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 27, 257)-net over F16, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(13,256) in PG(26,16)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- base reduction for projective spaces (embedding PG(13,256) in PG(26,16)) for nets [i] based on digital (0, 14, 257)-net over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 27, 257)-net over F16, using
- digital (84, 112, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 28, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256 (see above)
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 28, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (40, 54, 514)-net over F4, using
(166−28, 166, 18330)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (138, 166, 18330)-net over F4, using
(166−28, 166, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 166, large)-net in base 4, because
- 26 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 140, large)-net in base 4, but