Best Known (204−28, 204, s)-Nets in Base 4
(204−28, 204, 18733)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (176, 204, 18733)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 15, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (161, 189, 18724)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4189, 18724, F4, 28, 28) (dual of [(18724, 28), 524083, 29]-NRT-code), using
- OA 14-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(4189, 262136, F4, 28) (dual of [262136, 261947, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4189, 262143, F4, 28) (dual of [262143, 261954, 29]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4190, 262144, F4, 29) (dual of [262144, 261954, 30]-code), using
- an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 49−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4190, 262144, F4, 29) (dual of [262144, 261954, 30]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4189, 262143, F4, 28) (dual of [262143, 261954, 29]-code), using
- OA 14-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(4189, 262136, F4, 28) (dual of [262136, 261947, 29]-code), using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4189, 18724, F4, 28, 28) (dual of [(18724, 28), 524083, 29]-NRT-code), using
- digital (1, 15, 9)-net over F4, using
(204−28, 204, 176531)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (176, 204, 176531)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4204, 176531, F4, 28) (dual of [176531, 176327, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4204, 262212, F4, 28) (dual of [262212, 262008, 29]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4203, 262211, F4, 28) (dual of [262211, 262008, 29]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(20) [i] based on
- linear OA(4190, 262144, F4, 29) (dual of [262144, 261954, 30]-code), using an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 49−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- linear OA(4136, 262144, F4, 21) (dual of [262144, 262008, 22]-code), using an extension Ce(20) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262143 = 49−1, defining interval I = [1,20], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 21 [i]
- linear OA(413, 67, F4, 6) (dual of [67, 54, 7]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(5) ⊂ Ce(4) [i] based on
- linear OA(413, 64, F4, 6) (dual of [64, 51, 7]-code), using an extension Ce(5) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 43−1, defining interval I = [1,5], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 6 [i]
- linear OA(410, 64, F4, 5) (dual of [64, 54, 6]-code), using an extension Ce(4) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 43−1, defining interval I = [1,4], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 5 [i]
- linear OA(40, 3, F4, 0) (dual of [3, 3, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(40, s, F4, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(5) ⊂ Ce(4) [i] based on
- construction X applied to Ce(28) ⊂ Ce(20) [i] based on
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(4203, 262211, F4, 28) (dual of [262211, 262008, 29]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4204, 262212, F4, 28) (dual of [262212, 262008, 29]-code), using
(204−28, 204, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (176, 204, large)-net in base 4, because
- 26 times m-reduction [i] would yield (176, 178, large)-net in base 4, but