Best Known (56, 56+29, s)-Nets in Base 4
(56, 56+29, 139)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (56, 85, 139)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 15, 9)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- the Hermitian function field over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 9, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 8)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (41, 70, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 35, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 35, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 15, 9)-net over F4, using
(56, 56+29, 254)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (56, 85, 254)-net over F4, using
(56, 56+29, 8243)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (56, 85, 8244)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (56, 84, 8244)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 374 495604 822093 336284 106486 774070 783389 719736 143860 > 484 [i]