Best Known (184, 184+32, s)-Nets in Base 4
(184, 184+32, 16384)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (184, 216, 16384)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(4216, 16384, F4, 32, 32) (dual of [(16384, 32), 524072, 33]-NRT-code), using
- OA 16-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(4216, 262144, F4, 32) (dual of [262144, 261928, 33]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4217, 262145, F4, 33) (dual of [262145, 261928, 34]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262145 | 418−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4217, 262145, F4, 33) (dual of [262145, 261928, 34]-code), using
- OA 16-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(4216, 262144, F4, 32) (dual of [262144, 261928, 33]-code), using
(184, 184+32, 107819)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (184, 216, 107819)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(4216, 107819, F4, 2, 32) (dual of [(107819, 2), 215422, 33]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(4216, 131072, F4, 2, 32) (dual of [(131072, 2), 261928, 33]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(4216, 262144, F4, 32) (dual of [262144, 261928, 33]-code), using
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4217, 262145, F4, 33) (dual of [262145, 261928, 34]-code), using
- the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 262145 | 418−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(4217, 262145, F4, 33) (dual of [262145, 261928, 34]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(4216, 262144, F4, 32) (dual of [262144, 261928, 33]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(4216, 131072, F4, 2, 32) (dual of [(131072, 2), 261928, 33]-NRT-code), using
(184, 184+32, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (184, 216, large)-net in base 4, because
- 30 times m-reduction [i] would yield (184, 186, large)-net in base 4, but