Best Known (121−33, 121, s)-Nets in Base 4
(121−33, 121, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (88, 121, 531)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (87, 120, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 40, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 40, 177)-net over F64, using
(121−33, 121, 863)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (88, 121, 863)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4121, 863, F4, 33) (dual of [863, 742, 34]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4121, 1023, F4, 33) (dual of [1023, 902, 34]-code), using
- the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 1023 = 45−1, defining interval I = [0,32], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4121, 1023, F4, 33) (dual of [1023, 902, 34]-code), using
(121−33, 121, 74266)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (88, 121, 74267)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (88, 120, 74267)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 1 767075 603550 412251 786921 447992 786963 059628 351397 880382 873842 901390 635479 > 4120 [i]