Best Known (166−33, 166, s)-Nets in Base 4
(166−33, 166, 1076)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 166, 1076)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (18, 34, 48)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 17, 24)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 23)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (1, 17, 24)-net over F16, using
- digital (99, 132, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 33, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 33, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (18, 34, 48)-net over F4, using
(166−33, 166, 5677)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (133, 166, 5677)-net over F4, using
(166−33, 166, 3665722)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 166, 3665723)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (133, 165, 3665723)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2187 253496 951124 508876 150710 529105 621734 128007 913425 956655 447994 074928 807596 923246 834658 229023 836785 > 4165 [i]