MinT - Best Known (48−36, 48, s)-Nets in Base 4

Best Known (48−36, 48, s)-Nets in Base 4

(48−36, 48, 28)-Net over F₄ — Constructive and digital

Digital (12, 48, 28)-net over F₄, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 27)-sequence over F₄, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
  - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(48−36, 48, 29)-Net over F₄ — Digital

Digital (12, 48, 29)-net over F₄, using

net from sequence [i] based on digital (12, 28)-sequence over F₄, using
- Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 12 and N(F) ≥ 29, using
  - a curve from the manYPoints database [i]

(48−36, 48, 56)-Net over F₄ — Upper bound on s (digital)

There is no digital (12, 48, 57)-net over F₄, because

extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(4⁴⁸, 57, F₄, 36) (dual of [57, 9, 37]-code), but
- constructionÂ Y1 [i] would yield
  1. linear OA(4⁴⁷, 51, F₄, 36) (dual of [51, 4, 37]-code), but
    - a result by Landjev, Maruta, and Hill [i]
  2. OA(4⁹, 57, S₄, 6), but
    - discarding factors would yield OA(4⁹, 40, S₄, 6), but
      - the Rao or (dual) Hamming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 273901 > 4⁹ [i]

(48−36, 48, 59)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s

There is no (12, 48, 60)-net in base 4, because

extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(4⁴⁸, 60, S₄, 36), but
- the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 124209 476412 762829 676252 966875 561984 / 1 392469 > 4⁴⁸ [i]