Best Known (164, 164+36, s)-Nets in Base 4
(164, 164+36, 1539)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (164, 200, 1539)-net over F4, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (164, 204, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 68, 513)-net over F64, using
(164, 164+36, 15045)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (164, 200, 15045)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4200, 15045, F4, 36) (dual of [15045, 14845, 37]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4200, 16406, F4, 36) (dual of [16406, 16206, 37]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,16]) [i] based on
- linear OA(4197, 16385, F4, 37) (dual of [16385, 16188, 38]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,18], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−18,−17,…,18}|+1 = 38 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(4169, 16385, F4, 33) (dual of [16385, 16216, 34]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,16], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−16,−15,…,16}|+1 = 34 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(43, 21, F4, 2) (dual of [21, 18, 3]-code), using
- Hamming code H(3,4) [i]
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,16]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4200, 16406, F4, 36) (dual of [16406, 16206, 37]-code), using
(164, 164+36, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (164, 200, large)-net in base 4, because
- 34 times m-reduction [i] would yield (164, 166, large)-net in base 4, but