Best Known (188−37, 188, s)-Nets in Base 4
(188−37, 188, 1094)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (151, 188, 1094)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (22, 40, 66)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 33)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 32)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (2, 20, 33)-net over F16, using
- digital (111, 148, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 37, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 37, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (22, 40, 66)-net over F4, using
(188−37, 188, 6651)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (151, 188, 6651)-net over F4, using
(188−37, 188, 4526283)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (151, 188, 4526284)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (151, 187, 4526284)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 38478 577603 995063 078196 834174 879665 386005 666958 476655 479896 014592 558563 911819 374712 084084 698574 005974 701772 170276 > 4187 [i]