Best Known (198−37, 198, s)-Nets in Base 4
(198−37, 198, 1539)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 198, 1539)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (160, 198, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 66, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 66, 513)-net over F64, using
(198−37, 198, 11319)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (161, 198, 11319)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(4198, 11319, F4, 37) (dual of [11319, 11121, 38]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4198, 16400, F4, 37) (dual of [16400, 16202, 38]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,17]) [i] based on
- linear OA(4197, 16385, F4, 37) (dual of [16385, 16188, 38]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,18], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−18,−17,…,18}|+1 = 38 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(4183, 16385, F4, 35) (dual of [16385, 16202, 36]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 414−1, defining interval I = [0,17], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−17,−16,…,17}|+1 = 36 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(41, 15, F4, 1) (dual of [15, 14, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) with arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to C([0,18]) ⊂ C([0,17]) [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(4198, 16400, F4, 37) (dual of [16400, 16202, 38]-code), using
(198−37, 198, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 198, large)-net in base 4, because
- 35 times m-reduction [i] would yield (161, 163, large)-net in base 4, but