Best Known (200−39, 200, s)-Nets in Base 4
(200−39, 200, 1104)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (161, 200, 1104)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (25, 44, 76)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 22, 38)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 38, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 37)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 22, 38)-net over F16, using
- digital (117, 156, 1028)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 39, 257)-net over F256, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F256 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 257, using
- the rational function field F256(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 256)-sequence over F256, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 39, 257)-net over F256, using
- digital (25, 44, 76)-net over F4, using
(200−39, 200, 7405)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (161, 200, 7405)-net over F4, using
(200−39, 200, 5344157)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (161, 200, 5344158)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (161, 199, 5344158)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 645564 136250 297890 835415 238334 013008 441476 080866 801617 277875 820285 894987 932757 829035 659457 780503 814977 067648 241423 079798 > 4199 [i]