Best Known (200, 200+42, s)-Nets in Base 4
(200, 200+42, 1566)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (200, 242, 1566)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (199, 241, 1566)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 31, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (168, 210, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 70, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 70, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (10, 31, 27)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(200, 200+42, 19269)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (200, 242, 19269)-net over F4, using
(200, 200+42, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (200, 242, large)-net in base 4, because
- 40 times m-reduction [i] would yield (200, 202, large)-net in base 4, but