Best Known (202, 202+43, s)-Nets in Base 4
(202, 202+43, 1566)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (202, 245, 1566)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (201, 244, 1566)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 31, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (170, 213, 1539)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 71, 513)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- the Hermitian function field over F64 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 513, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 512)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (28, 71, 513)-net over F64, using
- digital (10, 31, 27)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(202, 202+43, 17914)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (202, 245, 17914)-net over F4, using
(202, 202+43, large)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (202, 245, large)-net in base 4, because
- 41 times m-reduction [i] would yield (202, 204, large)-net in base 4, but