Best Known (95, 95+47, s)-Nets in Base 4
(95, 95+47, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 142, 195)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (94, 141, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 47, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 47, 65)-net over F64, using
(95, 95+47, 208)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(95, 142, 208)-net in base 4, using
- 42 times duplication [i] based on (93, 140, 208)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (23, 70, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 56, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 56, 104)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (23, 70, 104)-net in base 16, using
(95, 95+47, 423)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (95, 142, 423)-net over F4, using
(95, 95+47, 15406)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 142, 15407)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (95, 141, 15407)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 7 778564 664027 761510 644604 098478 227576 816805 003783 802946 637824 946773 064493 552761 224792 > 4141 [i]