Best Known (14−5, 14, s)-Nets in Base 4
(14−5, 14, 240)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 14, 240)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(414, 240, F4, 5, 5) (dual of [(240, 5), 1186, 6]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(414, 481, F4, 5) (dual of [481, 467, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(414, 482, F4, 5) (dual of [482, 468, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(167, 241, F16, 5) (dual of [241, 234, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(414, 482, F4, 5) (dual of [482, 468, 6]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OA(414, 481, F4, 5) (dual of [481, 467, 6]-code), using
(14−5, 14, 245)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (9, 14, 245)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(414, 245, F4, 5) (dual of [245, 231, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(414, 482, F4, 5) (dual of [482, 468, 6]-code), using
- trace code [i] based on linear OA(167, 241, F16, 5) (dual of [241, 234, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(414, 482, F4, 5) (dual of [482, 468, 6]-code), using
(14−5, 14, 3860)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 14, 3861)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (9, 13, 3861)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 67 123486 > 413 [i]