Best Known (160−53, 160, s)-Nets in Base 4
(160−53, 160, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (107, 160, 195)-net over F4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on digital (106, 159, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 53, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 53, 65)-net over F64, using
(160−53, 160, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(107, 160, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 80, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 64, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 64, 120)-net over F32, using
(160−53, 160, 465)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (107, 160, 465)-net over F4, using
(160−53, 160, 16883)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (107, 160, 16884)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (107, 159, 16884)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 534604 559863 237553 353556 004361 868687 713925 677051 556887 765388 949451 194656 537082 510796 256719 574092 > 4159 [i]