Best Known (114, 114+57, s)-Nets in Base 4
(114, 114+57, 195)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (114, 171, 195)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (0, 57, 65)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the rational function field F64(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 64)-sequence over F64, using
(114, 114+57, 240)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(114, 171, 240)-net in base 4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on (113, 170, 240)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (28, 85, 120)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 68, 120)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 11 and N(F) ≥ 120, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (11, 119)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (11, 68, 120)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (28, 85, 120)-net in base 16, using
(114, 114+57, 481)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (114, 171, 481)-net over F4, using
(114, 114+57, 17008)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (114, 171, 17009)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (114, 170, 17009)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 2 241635 867647 338196 792458 285308 253963 321338 618364 511296 390058 302095 793921 876881 881056 701193 227837 286808 > 4170 [i]