Best Known (165, 165+58, s)-Nets in Base 4
(165, 165+58, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 223, 531)-net over F4, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 237, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 79, 177)-net over F64, using
(165, 165+58, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(165, 223, 648)-net in base 4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on (164, 222, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 74, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 74, 216)-net in base 64, using
(165, 165+58, 1697)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (165, 223, 1697)-net over F4, using
(165, 165+58, 165795)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 223, 165796)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 181 728299 909733 208739 537364 908417 117253 789984 842012 076910 785415 258966 353005 889434 159596 526384 132249 424494 071354 988160 737141 325346 854952 > 4223 [i]