Best Known (227−59, 227, s)-Nets in Base 4
(227−59, 227, 536)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 227, 536)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 29, 5)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- the rational function field F4(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (139, 198, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 66, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (0, 29, 5)-net over F4, using
(227−59, 227, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(168, 227, 648)-net in base 4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (168, 228, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 76, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 76, 216)-net in base 64, using
(227−59, 227, 1729)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (168, 227, 1729)-net over F4, using
(227−59, 227, 191365)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 227, 191366)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (168, 226, 191366)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 11630 907130 277186 136762 228897 640368 492860 544171 055307 392886 346888 048492 079773 813398 085082 493630 680976 933965 866935 691038 475278 027859 418096 > 4226 [i]