Best Known (168, 168+60, s)-Nets in Base 4
(168, 168+60, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 228, 531)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (167, 228, 531)-net over F4, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (167, 240, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 80, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 80, 177)-net over F64, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (167, 240, 531)-net over F4, using
(168, 168+60, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(168, 228, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 76, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
(168, 168+60, 1643)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (168, 228, 1643)-net over F4, using
(168, 168+60, 151095)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 228, 151096)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 186071 084946 136692 220200 553240 318066 009240 248627 119358 491296 906912 244054 109232 063510 887241 493180 699941 840959 308306 768653 416602 354397 762028 > 4228 [i]