Best Known (164−61, 164, s)-Nets in Base 4
(164−61, 164, 135)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (103, 164, 135)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 30, 5)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- generalized Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- the rational function field F4(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 4)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 134, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 67, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 67, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 30, 5)-net over F4, using
(164−61, 164, 316)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (103, 164, 316)-net over F4, using
(164−61, 164, 7472)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (103, 164, 7473)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (103, 163, 7473)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 137 220311 063269 784431 295272 135798 758830 131491 646543 585159 157807 877644 101462 727142 726549 790944 437008 > 4163 [i]