Best Known (171, 171+61, s)-Nets in Base 4
(171, 171+61, 531)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (171, 232, 531)-net over F4, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (171, 246, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 82, 177)-net over F64, using
(171, 171+61, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(171, 232, 648)-net in base 4, using
- 41 times duplication [i] based on (170, 231, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 66, 216)-net over F128, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (16, 77, 216)-net in base 64, using
(171, 171+61, 1675)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (171, 232, 1675)-net over F4, using
(171, 171+61, 173567)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (171, 232, 173568)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (171, 231, 173568)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 11 909847 436574 719102 883037 311272 791211 617906 205978 215381 975818 558524 712188 504501 701602 219720 779983 657003 072029 054269 803203 430750 893608 308385 > 4231 [i]