Best Known (23, 23+64, s)-Nets in Base 4
(23, 23+64, 34)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 87, 34)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 87, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
(23, 23+64, 45)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (23, 87, 45)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 44)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
(23, 23+64, 101)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 87, 102)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 86, 102)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(486, 102, S4, 63), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 210 954447 681461 238086 231573 344754 090423 690638 872886 010655 539200 / 33075 093051 > 486 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(486, 102, S4, 63), but