Best Known (89−66, 89, s)-Nets in Base 4
(89−66, 89, 34)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (23, 89, 34)-net over F4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 89, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
(89−66, 89, 45)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (23, 89, 45)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (23, 44)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 23 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
(89−66, 89, 100)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (23, 89, 101)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (23, 88, 101)-net in base 4, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(488, 101, S4, 65), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 7 350486 132137 803174 451709 414576 177373 255858 225467 384414 601216 / 68 067901 > 488 [i]
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(488, 101, S4, 65), but