Best Known (257−67, 257, s)-Nets in Base 4
(257−67, 257, 541)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (190, 257, 541)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 35, 10)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 9)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 9)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (155, 222, 531)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 74, 177)-net over F64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F64 with g(F) = 7 and N(F) ≥ 177, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (7, 176)-sequence over F64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (7, 74, 177)-net over F64, using
- digital (2, 35, 10)-net over F4, using
(257−67, 257, 648)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(190, 257, 648)-net in base 4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (190, 258, 648)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 86, 216)-net in base 64, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 91, 216)-net in base 64, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 78, 216)-net over F128, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F128 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 216, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 215)-sequence over F128, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 78, 216)-net over F128, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on (18, 91, 216)-net in base 64, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (18, 86, 216)-net in base 64, using
(257−67, 257, 1905)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (190, 257, 1905)-net over F4, using
(257−67, 257, 205447)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (190, 257, 205448)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (190, 256, 205448)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 13407 946386 209734 691929 663277 249099 935131 120306 026858 266680 536486 294607 116562 044042 568671 074178 485982 637852 569252 683900 924466 548418 864994 033560 622625 276300 > 4256 [i]