Best Known (19−7, 19, s)-Nets in Base 4
(19−7, 19, 71)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (12, 19, 71)-net over F4, using
- generalized (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 1, 17)-net over F4, using
- s-reduction based on digital (0, 1, s)-net over F4 with arbitrarily large s, using
- digital (1, 3, 17)-net over F4, using
- s-reduction based on digital (1, 3, 21)-net over F4, using
- digital (1, 4, 17)-net over F4, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(44, 17, F4, 3, 3) (dual of [(17, 3), 47, 4]-NRT-code), using
- digital (4, 11, 20)-net over F4, using
- digital (0, 1, 17)-net over F4, using
(19−7, 19, 125)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (12, 19, 125)-net over F4, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(419, 125, F4, 7) (dual of [125, 106, 8]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(419, 172, F4, 7) (dual of [172, 153, 8]-code), using
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(418, 171, F4, 7) (dual of [171, 153, 8]-code), using
- a “Gra†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- 1 times code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OA(418, 171, F4, 7) (dual of [171, 153, 8]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(419, 172, F4, 7) (dual of [172, 153, 8]-code), using
(19−7, 19, 2478)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (12, 19, 2479)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (12, 18, 2479)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 68721 472072 > 418 [i]