Best Known (133, 133+79, s)-Nets in Base 4
(133, 133+79, 144)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (133, 212, 144)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (3, 42, 14)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 13)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 14, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 13)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (91, 170, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 85, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 85, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (3, 42, 14)-net over F4, using
(133, 133+79, 152)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(133, 212, 152)-net in base 4, using
- 42 times duplication [i] based on (131, 210, 152)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (26, 105, 76)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 84, 76)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 5 and N(F) ≥ 76, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (5, 75)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (5, 84, 76)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (26, 105, 76)-net in base 16, using
(133, 133+79, 391)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (133, 212, 391)-net over F4, using
(133, 133+79, 9249)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (133, 212, 9250)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (133, 211, 9250)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 10 866452 945711 517855 011545 521640 993595 574370 732469 957182 061809 451596 296715 703094 882959 615369 833887 548392 690778 997200 901090 535936 > 4211 [i]