Best Known (125, 125+83, s)-Nets in Base 4
(125, 125+83, 131)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (125, 208, 131)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (125, 209, 131)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (10, 52, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 157, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (10, 52, 27)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(125, 125+83, 305)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (125, 208, 305)-net over F4, using
(125, 125+83, 5861)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (125, 208, 5862)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (125, 207, 5862)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 42576 544111 810045 386174 476468 014681 594933 854563 736803 180589 489185 892288 708069 453377 645797 276849 648581 795198 160621 168421 503000 > 4207 [i]