Best Known (249−89, 249, s)-Nets in Base 4
(249−89, 249, 163)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 249, 163)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (15, 59, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (101, 190, 130)-net over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 95, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 95, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (15, 59, 33)-net over F4, using
(249−89, 249, 208)-Net in Base 4 — Constructive
(160, 249, 208)-net in base 4, using
- t-expansion [i] based on (159, 249, 208)-net in base 4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (159, 250, 208)-net in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (34, 125, 104)-net in base 16, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 100, 104)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 103)-sequence over F32, using
- base change [i] based on digital (9, 100, 104)-net over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (34, 125, 104)-net in base 16, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on (159, 250, 208)-net in base 4, using
(249−89, 249, 521)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (160, 249, 521)-net over F4, using
(249−89, 249, 14194)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 249, 14195)-net in base 4, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (160, 248, 14195)-net in base 4, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 204772 136696 713319 680108 147293 808875 747133 961071 336159 289278 572488 466940 512486 408886 774318 406475 070251 894841 888283 479402 192812 114363 670429 250076 179620 > 4248 [i]