Best Known (229−90, 229, s)-Nets in Base 4
(229−90, 229, 138)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (139, 229, 138)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 66, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 163, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (21, 66, 34)-net over F4, using
(229−90, 229, 349)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (139, 229, 349)-net over F4, using
(229−90, 229, 6768)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (139, 229, 6769)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 745695 533795 376990 305773 369264 636277 941627 605388 942861 182432 620875 021632 205283 841349 575064 997362 969722 566855 596148 335623 464450 618391 236416 > 4229 [i]