Best Known (232−92, 232, s)-Nets in Base 4
(232−92, 232, 138)-Net over F4 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 232, 138)-net over F4, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 67, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (73, 165, 104)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- F6 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 73 and N(F) ≥ 104, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (73, 103)-sequence over F4, using
- digital (21, 67, 34)-net over F4, using
(232−92, 232, 343)-Net over F4 — Digital
Digital (140, 232, 343)-net over F4, using
(232−92, 232, 6487)-Net in Base 4 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 232, 6488)-net in base 4, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 47 863745 352327 693881 239837 980645 394316 898117 670569 541731 654921 447123 301531 296619 016269 947535 036518 392235 758493 131312 024817 664460 002963 477540 > 4232 [i]